Friday, September 19, 2014

A New Agriculture

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000195 EndHTML:0000008685 StartFragment:0000002407 EndFragment:0000008649 SourceURL:file://localhost/Users/jimspeth/Desktop/Internship/ISGP%20Blog%202%20-%20Speth
About 6 times a year for the past three years I have made the trek from my school in southeastern Pennsylvania to my home in Chicago, Illinois. While every 12-hour drive offers a new set of adventures, my favorite by far is the first one of the year in late August. The never-ending farms that stretch from Illinois to central Pennsylvania are just reaching harvest. I love looking at the swaying golden wheat, the infinite fields of rich-green soybeans, and the cornfields that even the most directionally competent person would get lost in. While I do adore the view, I also have to acknowledge that looks can be deceiving. This form of intense annual agriculture, which may be visual pleasing, actually causes several significant issues, such as increased greenhouse gases; increase pesticide use, and decreased food security due to vulnerable crops. These environmental and food-related issues are exacerbated even more since the global demand for grain is currently dramatically increasing. Our world simply cannot economically or socially afford for much longer these issues in intense annual agriculture. Thus, in order to combat these issues, we must reevaluate the agricultural system and begin to shift toward a more sustainable, secure system of perennial agriculture.
            Before we examine the benefits of perennial agriculture though, we must first understand the issues associated with annuals. Annuals, which are defined as a crop that completes its life cycle within one year and then dies, have been popular since the domestication of crops, about 10,000 years ago. Our Neolithic ancestors realized that the annuals, such as wheat, maize/corn, soybeans, etc, adapted better to soil conditions. In addition, annuals seeds were preferred over perennials because annual seeds were bigger and easier to handle. Due to this, the selection pressure was unintentionally applied to the annuals, thus making them even more desirable. As these annuals rose to dominance, their environmental issues became more apparent. These issues stem from the fact that annuals have a shorter growing season and shallower, less dense roots than perennials. This trait limits the nutrients and the water available to them. Thus, annual plants require an excessive amount of fertilizers and pesticides, which are associated with increase greenhouse gases and runoff of dangerous chemicals. In addition to the required inputs, the root structure of the annuals also makes them more susceptible to temperature changes, which, at a time of climate change, is troubling.
            In order to combat the negative impacts of annuals while also ensuring food security in a world of shrinking resources, we must begin to develop perennial crops. Perennials are defined as crops that live longer than two years. So while annuals die after one year, perennials can be harvest multiple times over several years before they die. Even though perennials have been ignored for centuries, they are actually extremely beneficial. Unlike annuals, perennials have long, dense root system and a long growing season. This trait makes them more effective in maintaining topsoil by reducing water and nitrate lost. This also means that the perennials require much less inputs due to increase access to nutrient in the soil, thus decreasing cost and mitigating greenhouse gas emission. In addition, the root structure and resilience of perennials allows them to be planted on more-marginal lands. In other words, perennials can be planted on lands that are less fertile; therefore they can be used to increase the economic and biological diversity of farms. Lastly and most importantly, perennials are more resilient to social, political, health, and environmental disturbances. Since they do not rely on annual seed preparations or constant inputs, a perennial will still be productive even when there is a lack of human interference.
            The question that now faces us is: “is adapting perennials physically and economically feasible?” In short, the answer is yes. Adapting perennials is physically possible both in the sense of domestication/hybridization and crop yield. Domestication/hybridization would consist of breeding wild perennials for desirable traits. One could also crossbreed an annual, such as wheat, with a perennial relative in order to achieve an intermediate. In relation to crop yield, it may seem counterintuitive to have an intense root system AND a high crop yield. This is because carbon is captured and used in photosynthesis to produce energy, which is then allocated to different parts of the plant. Thus, if more is going to the root less would go to producing seeds. Luckily though, plants are flexible organisms that respond to selection pressures. This means that depending on a plants environment, the resources available can expand or shrink. So, by putting a perennial in a fertile environment, there would be an adequate amount of resources for both an intense root system and a high crop yield.

            When it comes to economic feasibility is when the idea of shifting to perennials becomes difficult. Currently, less than $1.5 million dollars directly supports perennial grain projects. In order to achieve an efficient perennial system, much more resources and funding will be necessary. These resources would have to come from both the private and public sector. Even when perennial grains are developed, there will still need to be programs and monetary incentives to persuade farmers to make the shift.  Once the resources of secured though, they will be nothing to stop this necessary shift to a sustainable, perennial agricultural system.

No comments:

Post a Comment